I've not had my Flickr account for long - in fact, I only started uploading photos to it about a week ago. However, I've already received my first piece of 'Flickr Spam':
…We at NowPublic are working on coverage of a 4 year old to
climb Eiffel Tower, and we are putting together a
collection of photos. We came across your amazing photo on
Flickr and it would be a great addition to our story…
Now, the photo in question of the Eiffel Tower was one I took about 4 years ago on my Fuji Finepix e550 compact. When I decided to read the article in question, I discovered they already had nearly 50 photos of the Eiffel Tower assigned to this article, so why did they need mine as well?
I did a quick google and discovered that others had similar worries, with the comments on Bill Day's blog quite eye-opening.
The big problem as I see it, is if we, the general public, who have no intention of making money from our photographs (although it would be nice!), start giving them away for free, it cheapens photography as a whole. As a web developer, I'm constantly aware that we get undercut by the 'ubiquitious man in the pub' who can do it 'as cheap as you like mate' from his back bedroom. I'd not want to do the same to the photographers out there who rely on this as their income!








